A New sancta et fidelis societas for Saint Sigismund of Burgundy: His Cult and Iconography in Hungary during the Reign of Sigismund of Luxemburg
Dragoş Gh. Năstăsoiu
Central European University, Department of Medieval Studies
Examining both written and pictorial evidence, this study addresses the diffusion of the cult of St Sigismund from Bohemia to Hungary during the late fourteenth century and the saint’s subsequent transformation during the fifteenth century into one of the Hungarian kingdom’s patrons. In doing so, it assesses the significance of the actions that King Sigismund took to promote Sigismund of Burgundy, his personal patron, in Hungary and shows that the king emulated the model of his father, Charles IV of Luxemburg. King Sigismund promoted his spiritual patron within his kingdom and associated him with the traditional Hungarian patrons, the sancti reges Hungariae. The king thus succeeded in accommodating the foreign saint to a new home and transforming him for a short interval into one of Hungary’s holy protectors. The natural consequence of this “holy and faithful fellowship” was the transfer of the cult from the royal milieu to the nobility of the kingdom. Willing to prove their loyalty to the king, Hungarian noblemen decorated their churches with St Sigismund’s image and depicted him in the company of the saints Stephen, Emeric, and Ladislas. The study’s larger aim is to illustrate how the political transformations of a certain period could facilitate the spread of a new saint’s cult from the cult center to another region and that a saint’s veneration could sometimes be politically motivated.
Keywords: St Sigismund of Burgundy, Sigismund of Luxemburg, cult of saints, relics, sancti reges Hungariae, wall painting, iconography
Writing on the cults of dynastic saints in medieval Europe, Gábor Klaniczay showed that members of ruling dynasties were generally fervent supporters and promoters of cults of saints, especially those who had descended from their own families. Hungarian and Neapolitan Angevins, Přemyslids, or Luxemburgs harmoniously blended their personal piety with astute political calculation when proving their legitimacy to rule. Having several saints in the family or associating one’s deeds with a particular saint (especially one’s namesake) was an extension of that saint’s sacredness over his protégé, guaranteeing the success of a ruler’s actions.1 Examining the iconography of Sigismund of Luxemburg, Bertalan Kéry revealed that the Holy Roman Emperor had a high devotion for his personal patron, St Sigismund of Burgundy, and that medieval artists sometimes depicted the saint under his protégé’s appearance.2 Whereas King Sigismund’s devotion for his namesake protector received previous attention, it became apparent only recently that the new King of Hungary promoted his personal patron and one of Bohemia’s holy protectors within his realm.3
By examining the written and pictorial evidence, the present paper addresses the diffusion during the late fourteenth century of the cult of St Sigismund of Burgundy from Bohemia to Hungary and the saint’s subsequent transformation by the late fifteenth century into one of the patrons of the Hungarian kingdom. In doing so, it assesses the significance of King Sigismund’s efforts to promote his personal patron saint in Hungary and shows that he emulated the model of his father, Charles IV of Luxemburg, a fervent supporter and promoter of the cults of saints, an avid collector of relics, and a great patron of the arts. King Sigismund not only promoted his personal patron within his kingdom, but also associated him with St Ladislas, the patron saint par excellence of the Hungarian kingdom. Sigismund thus managed to accommodate the foreign saint to a new home and to transform him into one of the country’s holy protectors. The natural consequence of this association was the transfer of the new cult from the royal milieu to the kingdom’s aristocracy: willing to prove their loyalty to the king, Hungarian noblemen decorated their churches with the image of St Sigismund and depicted him in the company of the three sancti reges Hungariae, i.e., St Stephen, St Emeric, and St Ladislas. The paper’s larger aim is to illustrate how the political transformations of a certain period facilitated the transfer of a new saint’s cult from the cult center to another region and that a saint’s veneration was sometimes politically motivated.
One Saint—Two Cult Centers: St Sigismund of Burgundy between Agaune and Prague
King Sigismund of Burgundy (r. 516–24) was a convert from the Arian faith of his forebears to the orthodoxy of the Church of Rome and founder of the Abbey of Saint-Maurice d’Agaune in Valais, Switzerland (515). He was an impulsive and violent-tempered ruler, who had his son Sigeric killed mercilessly at the instigation of his new wife (522). Shortly after the murder of the king and his family by Frankish King Chlodomer, the Abbot of Saint-Maurice Venerandus became interested in the remains of his monastery’s founder and brought them for burial to Agaune from a well near Orléans, where the king’s body was lying together with his massacred family (535). From that moment on, the cult of the holy king and martyr Sigismund started its gradual development in the shadow of the cult of St Maurice and his fellow Theban martyrs.4 The monks of Agaune managed by the late sixth century to create for the founder of their abbey an aura of sanctity revolving around St Sigismund’s healing power over fevers. This was reflected by the Missa sancti Sigismundi regis pro febricitantibus, a votive mass composed initially for the forgiveness of King Sigismund’s sins, later sung as a means of seeking cure through the saint’s intercession.5 As attested by the distribution of relics, church dedications and commemoration through liturgical and hagiographical texts, St Sigismund’s cult was present until the mid-fourteenth century, mainly in Southern France, Italy, Switzerland, Germany, and the Low Countries.6 This regional diffusion indicates a moderate veneration of St Sigismund, who was known, though not popular in other parts of Europe.
The situation changed through the actions of Charles IV of Luxemburg, King of Bohemia (1346–78) and Holy Roman Emperor (1355–78), whose great knowledge of the cults of saints, understanding of the power and value of relics, and intense piety made him a passionate collector of relics.7 He acquired first in 1354, from the Benedictine Monastery in Einsiedeln, a piece of St Sigismund’s skull, which ended up in St Vitus Cathedral in Prague.8 However, it was only in 1365, when Charles IV was crowned King of Burgundy and strengthened his imperial power in the region, that he took great interest in the cult of the sixth-century holy king, whose successor he claimed to be from that point on.9 Detouring to Agaune from his coronation site in Arles, Charles IV took with him, despite the abbot’s reluctance to hand them over, the ax of St Maurice’s martyrdom and St Sigismund’s skull and half the body, i.e., a significant part of the holy king’s relics.10 He arranged for their transfer to Prague through a series of well-orchestrated actions, which resulted in the rapid transformation of St Sigismund of Burgundy into one of Bohemia’s patron saints.11
As convincingly argued by David Ch. Mengel,12 the Burgundian royal martyr was placed from the very beginning in the sancta et fidelis societas of St Wenceslas,13 the tenth-century royal martyr and Bohemia’s traditional patron.14 St Sigismund’s relics arrived to Prague on the vigil of St Wenceslas (September 27), when the town was filled with people coming for one of the annual fairs. They were transferred the next day to St Vitus Cathedral, which was miraculously illuminated during the office of matins: a sign of St Sigismund’s previous merits and future miracles and a symbol of St Wenceslas’ rejoicing in such holy and faithful companionship. The relics were then placed in a prominent chapel situated opposite the shrine of St Wenceslas.15 The diocese-wide proclamation of the advent of St Sigismund’s relics requested by the Archbishop of Prague during a diocesan synod (October 17, 1365)16 and numerous miracles occurring immediately at the saint’s new shrine17 testify to the cult’s carefully planned promotion by the archbishop and emperor and to the great impact that the transfer of the holy king’s relics had in Bohemia. St Sigismund attracted numerous pilgrims seeking to be healed to Prague, both Archbishop John Očko of Vlašim and Charles IV himself being cured of fevers through the holy king’s miraculous intervention (late January of 1366 and summer of 1371).18 The cult’s rapid success and its strong support from Charles IV—who named his third-born son, the future King of Hungary and Holy Roman Emperor Sigismund of Luxemburg, after St Sigismund in 1368—led finally to the establishment of the saint as one of the country’s patrons.19 Consequently, at the 1366 diocesan synod in Prague, St Sigismund’s feast day was moved from May 1 to May 2 so that he could have a separate celebration on a different date from that of the Holy Apostles Philip and James. This was an honor usually granted to a country’s patron saint and was granted to Sigismund on account of his great and glorious miracles.20 St Sigismund’s newly acquired significance was reflected also in the religious art commissioned by his two promoters, the Burgundian holy king appearing twice in the early 1370s in the company of Bohemia’s traditional patrons, i.e., St Wenceslas, St Adalbert, St Vitus, St Procopius and St Ludmila: once on the votive panel ordered by Archbishop John Očko of Vlašim (before 1371) and a second time, as the result of Charles IV’s commission, on the mosaics above the Golden Gate of St Vitus Cathedral (1370–71).21
Two Sigismunds in Late Medieval Hungary: King Sigismund of Luxemburg and St Sigismund of Burgundy
As shown by Péter Tóth, the presence of St Sigismund’s cult in medieval Hungary was mediated by the transfer of the saint’s relics to Prague and the advent as King of Hungary of Sigismund of Luxemburg (1387–1437), who was the son of Charles IV and who promoted his personal patron in the region.22 Before this date, there is scant evidence of St Sigismund’s veneration in Hungary: some of the earliest Hungarian calendars do, nevertheless, contain the feasts of his martyrdom (May 1) and the translatio of his relics (October 15/16); however, the holy king’s passio, office, and votive mass are missing from these eleventh-to-fourteenth-century liturgical manuscripts23 and only the church in Kopács (Kopačevo, Croatia) was dedicated to St Sigismund (1299).24 This indicates that the cult of the first medieval royal saint was confined in limited form to Hungarian church practice and did not manage to become popular until the end of the fourteenth century, when the situation changed radically.
St Sigismund’s reputation seemingly spread rapidly outside Bohemia and news of the translation of his relics to Prague soon reached the neighboring Kingdom of Hungary. The gilded silver statue of St Sigismund was donated by quemdam nobilem de Hungaria to the saint’s shrine and appeared in the 1374 inventory of St Vitus’ treasury.25 In 1375, the Statuta capituli Varadiensis recorded the existence of an altar dedicated to St Sigismund in the Cathedral of Nagyvárad (Oradea, Romania).26 Sometime between 1364 and 1380, the chaplain of King Louis the Great requested permission to venerate St Sigismund’s relics kept in the Cathedral of Olomouc since the early thirteenth century.27 The Hungarian altars and churches dedicated to the new Bohemian patron correspond to the reign of Sigismund of Luxemburg and were obviously inspired by the king’s devotion to his personal patron: the altar in Körmöcbánya (Kremnica, Slovakia, 1391),28 the royal chapter church in Buda (1410–24), the Pauline monastery in Verőce (1414–33), and the churches and chapels in Niva (1422), Úszfalva (Uzovce, Slovakia, 1429), and Hásság (Haşag, Romania, 1446).29 St Sigismund gradually made his presence felt in liturgical writings as well. His feasts originating in Bohemian liturgical practice, i.e., the martyrdom of the saint (May 2) and the translatio of his relics (September 27), appear in several late-fourteenth-century or fifteenth-century missals with either Hungarian provenance or use.30 St Sigismund’s Life was known in Hungary by the early fifteenth century, when a Legenda aurea manuscript (copied in Italy in the second half of the fourteenth century) was augmented by two Hungarian users with several legends, including that of St Sigismund, the incipit of which is Tempore Tiberij . . .31 The votive mass pro febricitantibus is featured in two fifteenth-century missals32 and two orationes (Sancti Sigismundi martiris and Rex et martyr, Sigismunde...) appear in a prayer book written around the year 1460 in Southern Germany or Bohemia, though used in Upper Hungary.33 The final outcome of this slow process was the inclusion of St Sigismund among Hungary’s patron saints, as attested by Legende sanctorum regni Hungarie in lombardica historia non contente (Strasbourg, 1484–1487)34 and its subsequent editions published in Venice (1498 and 1512).35 In this collection of saints’ lives which are relevant for Hungary, though omitted by Legenda aurea, one can also read the vita of St Sigismund: he was naturalized at last and enjoyed the company of Hungary’s traditional patrons, i.e., the three sancti reges Hungariae—Stephen, Emeric, and Ladislas.36
Regarded as a zealous promoter of his patron’s cult,37 King Sigismund indeed tried to promote his namesake saint in Hungary. His actions are better understood when compared to the practices of veneration and promotion employed by Sigismund’s father, Charles IV of Luxemburg. Soon after moving his residence from Visegrád to Buda (1408), King Sigismund started the construction next to his new court of a royal chapter church, a project on which he spent many thousands of florins by the year 1410. This attracted the praise of Pope John XXIII in a letter issued on August 3, followed fifteen days later by another one authorizing the access of visitors to the church in Buda on certain Marian feasts.38 The construction of the chapter church was completed during the years 1419–24, as attested by accounts of visitors to the church, which received the double patronage of the Holy Virgin and St Sigismund.39 As noted by András Végh,40 there are too many similarities between King Sigismund’s religious foundation in Buda and that of Charles IV in Nuremberg (1355–58)41 not to notice whose model of devotion and artistic patronage the Hungarian king followed. Both churches were located outside, though close to the royal residence, on the site of a former Jewish quarter.42 As far as one can judge by the ground plan of the vanished church in Buda, they both displayed similar architectural features and sculptural decoration.43 Both fulfilled the function of court chapels and collegiate chapter churches.44 Most significantly, they enjoyed a similar double patronage, being placed first under the protection of the Holy Virgin and, second, under that of the founder’s patron saint, i.e., St Sigismund, for the church in Buda45 and St Wenceslas for the church in Nuremberg, the founder of which was Karolus, qui et Wenceslaus.46
King Sigismund understood the importance of relics in the promotion of a saint’s cult and, like his father, he endeavored to acquire St Sigismund’s relics in order to distribute them within his kingdom. A seventeenth-century copy of a document dated June 30, 1414 accounts for King Sigismund’s visit to Agaune with the explicit intention to acquire some of his patron’s relics and take them to Hungary.47 More precisely, to a chapel the king was going to build in Voarenza, a deserted place in the Diocese of Vác, which was found next to an island on the Danube, a location lying in the proximity of the royal palace in Visegrád and identified with Verőce. The chapel was to be dedicated to St Sigismund and entrusted to the care of Pauline monks.48 The document also offers relevant information on King Sigismund’s devotion to his patron saint and his intention to spread and ensure the continuity of the royal martyr’s cult across the kingdom.49 After referring to the relic-oriented visit of Charles IV to Agaune50 and to Sigismund’s desire to follow in the footsteps of his father,51 the document contains an account of the miraculous opening of the reliquary. This represented St Sigismund’s consent for his new and partial relocation of relics, i.e., a small bone, a piece of the saint’s arm, and a skull portion of one of the saint’s sons, which King Sigismund took away to Hungary.52 Although the document mentions only the church in Verőce, it is unlikely that the Pauline monastery was the exclusive recipient of St Sigismund’s relics, especially if one thinks that in the moment of the king’s pious visit and acquisition of relics, the church in Buda was being built and dedicated precisely to the Burgundian saint. It is unknown what relics the church in Buda possessed, but like the Nuremberg Frauenkirche, which had a side altar dedicated to St Wenceslas,53 it is highly possible that King Sigismund provided the secondary altar of his foundation with the relics of his personal and the church’s associated patron.54 The existence before 1375 in the Cathedral of the Holy Virgin and St Ladislas in Nagyvárad of an altar dedicated to St Sigismund makes one reflect upon the possibility that part of the saint’s relics were intended also for King Sigismund’s favorite cathedral. In any case, in 1424, the Cathedral in Nagyvárad housed St Sigismund’s relics, transferred temporarily from Prague by King Sigismund, who tried to protect them from the rage of the Hussites.55
Choosing Nagyvárad Cathedral for the temporary relocation of St Sigismund’s relics was not without motivation. This was the cult center and burial place of one of Hungary’s holy kings, St Ladislas, with whose cult Sigismund of Luxemburg became acquainted shortly after he arrived to the Hungarian court (1379) and for whom he maintained high devotion throughout his life.56 During his reign, King Sigismund was present in Nagyvárad on numerous occasions57 and, after the death of his wife, Queen Mary of Hungary, and her burial next to the tomb of St Ladislas (1395), the king directed his attention repeatedly toward the cathedral and his holy predecessor’s remains.58 In 1401 and 1434, King Sigismund requested papal indulgences for the pilgrims who visited the cathedral and venerated the holy king’s miracle-working relics.59 He took part himself in such a pilgrimage together with King Władysław II Jagiełło, spending fifteen days and celebrating Easter in Nagyvárad. Sigismund’s expression of piety toward St Ladislas came after his conclusion of a peace treaty with the Polish ruler (1412).60 After a fire in the early 1400s that destroyed the cathedral’s sacristy and melted down St Ladislas’ head reliquary, though left the relics unharmed, King Sigismund was likely involved in the commissioning of the holy king’s exquisite new reliquary, kept today at the Cathedral of Győr. He also supported the cathedral’s partial rebuilding in the years 1406–07 through the royal confirmation of privileges and donations.61 It is in one of these charters that King Sigismund entrusted his salvation to the intercession of St Ladislas and expressed his desire to be buried next to the holy king’s sepulcher in the Cathedral of Nagyvárad.62 He maintained his wish even after he became Holy Roman Emperor,63 a fact that serves to point out to the king’s utmost devotion for one of Hungary’s patrons. That St Ladislas was indeed important for King Sigismund is illustrated also by the king’s keeping of the golden florin with the holy knight’s figure on the reverse. In 1427, he also issued a silver ducat with the saint’s iconic image bearing a crown, crucifer orb, and battle axe.64 All these facts attest not only to King Sigismund’s personal piety toward one of Hungary’s patrons, but also to his understanding of St Ladislas as a powerful symbol of the Kingdom of Hungary and an efficient tool for political legitimizing and self-representation.
The possibility cannot be excluded, however, that King Sigismund also revered Hungary’s other holy kings, although except for a 1404 royal confirmation of privileges addressed to the Cathedral in Székesfehérvár (i.e., the cult center of St Stephen and St Emeric and traditional burial site of Hungarian kings), no other evidence points out to such devotion.65 Nevertheless, St Ladislas, the sacred protector par excellence of the Hungarian kingdom, was associated with the king’s personal patron, St Sigismund, portrayed under the physical appearance of his protégé in the murals of the Augustinian Church in Constance, which were commissioned and partly ideated by King Sigismund himself during his stay there for the council (1417).66 No longer identifiable in its entirety, the gallery of enthroned holy kings, princes, bishops, and female saints seems to reflect Sigismund’s personal piety for the two holy kings, endorsing also his political and dynastical claims.67 The association of the two holy kings makes one think of the double dedication to St Ladislas and St Sigismund of the Pauline monastery in Kysbathe (Gerchen), which Nicholas Zámbó de Mezőlak, former Castellan of Óbuda and Master of the Treasury (1382–84, 1385–88), founded prior to the years 1383–84,68 i.e., sometime after Sigismund’s stay at the Hungarian court (1379–81) and close to the time of his marriage to his betrothed, Queen Mary of Hungary (1385). Their marriage, threatened by Elizabeth of Bosnia’s intention to marry her daughter to Louis of Orléans, was personally supported by Nicholas Zámbó and others, who openly opposed the queen mother and renounced their allegiance to her (August 1384).69 The monastery’s double dedication to St Ladislas and St Sigismund by a dignitary of the royal court (and supporter of the future king, for that matter) antedates the actions of Sigismund of Luxemburg, but shows that others were aware as well of the benefits this sancta et fidelis societas (i.e., between the sacred protector of Sigismund’s adoptive country and his personal patron saint) could have in making a newcomer accepted as the new King of Hungary.
St Sigismund of Burgundy and the Holy Kings of Hungary in Religious Mural Painting
Several murals preserved in churches throughout medieval Hungary feature the country’s traditional patrons, i.e., St Stephen, St Emeric, and St Ladislas, atypically associated with a fourth holy king, whose identity is most likely that of St Sigismund of Burgundy, the king’s personal patron saint. A closer examination of these frescoes and the background of their commissioners is destined to suggest possible explanations for the way in which St Sigismund’s cult was transferred from the royal milieu to the aristocratic one. The collective representation of Hungary’s three holy kings was the consequence of their joint cult, which took shape around the middle of the fourteenth century in the royal milieu and gained popularity during the reigns of Louis the Great of Anjou (1342–82) and Sigismund of Luxemburg,70 when the veneration of sancti reges Hungariae spread considerably among the noblemen of the kingdom.71 By imitating the devotional practices of the royal court, the nobility also replicated the patterns of artistic patronage, decorating many of its churches with the image of sancti reges Hungariae. The veneration and subsequent commissioning of murals with their image functioned as a strong statement of the noble donor’s political allegiance. This allegiance could be directed either toward the king, as an expression of loyalty toward the ruler, who rewarded the nobleman generously for faithful service, or directly to the kingdom, whenever the king’s person was no longer considered suitable to represent it.72 However, the strong political component of these depictions did not exclude the personal veneration of the royal saints by the frescoes’ commissioners, many of them being named after or having their family members named after them.73
The collective depiction in mural painting of sancti reges Hungariae usually places in a single composition the three holy rulers from the House of Árpád:74 St Stephen (r. 1000/01–38), the founder of the Christian Kingdom of Hungary, who merited his sanctity for ruling as rex iustus and converting his people to Christianity; St Emeric (1000/07–31), the son of the former, a pious and chaste prince, whom was educated to become a virtuous Christian ruler, but died before succeeding his father; and St Ladislas (r. 1077–95), ideal ruler and knight, the country’s defender against pagan enemies, and athleta patriae.75 Their highly conventional and stereotypical portrayal shows from a frontal perspective the full, standing figures of the holy kings characterized by hieratical appearance, static attitudes, and emphatic gestures.76 The murals show with slight variation a similar picture: an old, white-bearded St Stephen with crown, scepter, and orb; a young, beardless St Emeric with orb and lily or lily-shaped scepter, the symbol of his chastity; and a mature, brown-bearded St Ladislas holding a battle axe, a reminder of his chivalric bravery.77 The different ages of the royal saints—old for St Stephen, mature for St Ladislas, and young for St Emeric—could be an influence of the Three Magi’s iconography, which similarly shows the wise men at the three ages of kingship.78 As the great number of preserved frescoes attests, this age differentiation is, in fact, not an attempt to individualize the three characters, but rather a standardized and uniform depiction. Either dressed in elegant court costumes or as full-armored knights, the three are depicted as kings, being equally invested with royal insignia (crown, scepter, and orb).79 Despite the great uniformity and repetitiveness of the murals, there was also room for variation and innovation. In some cases, the unity of the group was disrupted, the saints being placed on separate, though conceptually unifying wall surfaces (e.g., the pillars of the triumphal arch) on which the sancti reges Hungariae stood in relation to one another.80 In other cases, there were not the usual three, but four royal saints, whom were depicted either together, within a single composition, or formed a coherent iconographic unit despite their obvious spatial separation.
On the southern wall of the sanctuary of Nicholas Apafi’s family church in Almakerék (Mălâncrav, Romania), painted either shortly before 1404/05 or in the 1420s,81 a unitarily conceived group of saints is surrounded by a decorative frame (Fig. 1). The standing figures with elegant postures and fashionable court costumes are: an old holy bishop with miter and crozier, identified either with St Gerard, St Nicholas, or St Adalbert;82 the mature, brown-bearded St Ladislas with crucifer orb and battle axe; the old, white-bearded St Stephen with scepter and crucifer orb; another mature, brown-bearded holy king with the same attributes as St Stephen; and the young, beardless St Emeric with blond, curly hair, holding an orb and originally a lily (now faded away).83 Because the accompanying inscriptions are no longer visible, it is difficult to ascertain the identity of the mature holy king placed between St Stephen and St Emeric and depicted with generic royal attributes.84 Anca Gogâltan identified him hypothetically as St Sigismund on the basis of the historical background of the frescoes, the donor’s attachment to the king, and the efforts of Sigismund of Luxemburg to promote the cult of his patron throughout the kingdom.85 St Sigismund was indeed depicted as a middle-aged holy king, dressed in royal garments, holding scepter and orb, and not having other distinguishing attributes.86
Four holy kings, two on each pillar and in superposed registers, seem to have faced each other originally on the pillars separating the nave from the southern aisle of the church in Csetnek (Štítnik, Slovakia), but currently only three of them are visible. The mural decoration of the church’s southern aisle was commissioned by Ladislas Csetneki during the 1420s, the decade in which the pillar frescoes were painted.87 The figures are poorly preserved and their individual identification is problematic, but one can notice a mixture of knightly, courtly, and royal elements in their costumes and attributes (Fig. 2). The saint on the eastern pillar’s upper register has chainmail under his tight tunic and holds an attribute with long handle (?) and shield. His counterpart on the western pillar is fully armored, wears a crown or ducal hat, props a shield and sword against the ground, and holds a similar, long-handled attribute with destroyed upper side, which could be either a spear, halberd, pollaxe, or banner. Below him (Fig. 3), a mature holy king in court costume and crown holds a crucifer orb and badly preserved attribute, probably a scepter. He has curly hair and beard covering only the lower part of his jaw. The representation facing him on the lower register of the eastern pillar was later replaced by the figure of a holy monk, but the partial detachment of the paint reveals that there was another, earlier saint painted there (Fig. 4). Several noticeable details suggest that this older figure represented a saint dressed in a red-brown vestment with a relatively large sleeve.88 His left arm was bent as for holding an attribute, probably a scepter or orb by analogy with his counterpart, who holds precisely these attributes. His halo, partially visible next to that of the holy monk, has the same color and outline as the halo of the saint facing him; both were placed under decorated, trefoil arches (Fig. 3–4). These features indicate that the two figures on the lower registers of the pillars are coeval, as they are with those on the upper registers. Faced with this evidence and given the dating of the murals, one can hypothesize that in Csetnek as well, the traditional, Hungarian royal trio was enriched with another holy king, although individual identification of the saints is no longer possible. However, the holy king’s curly hair and distinctively shaped beard (Fig. 3) recall the features of St Sigismund as they appear on the fresco in Constance and, implicitly, those of Sigismund of Luxemburg, whose facial traits were conferred often by medieval painters to the patron saint of the King of Hungary and Holy Roman Emperor.89
In the frescoes of the church in Lónya, either painted or commissioned by a certain mag(iste)r nicolaus in 1413,90 two holy kings were integrated to the sanctuary’s now-incomplete row of standing apostles (Fig. 5). Dressed in fashionable court costumes, the two standing figures with crown and crucifer orbs are identified by inscriptions: ·s(anctus)·dux/·emeri[c]us and ·s(anctus)·/rex/[s]tepha/nu[s]. Their facial features are damaged, though one clearly see that the former is brown-haired and holds a white lily, whereas the latter has white hair and beard, and holds a mace-like scepter. They are placed on the sanctuary’s southern wall, in the proximity of the pillar of the triumphal arch, where another partially preserved holy king is placed under a canopy (Fig. 5–6). This one has a similar crown, mantle, crucifer orb, and scepter with flower-shaped ending. His face is completely damaged, but the accompanying inscription identifies him as ·s(anctus)·/·sigism[undus]. The sanctuary’s 1413 decoration is now incompletely preserved and St Ladislas is missing; however, given his great popularity, it is unlikely that the holy knight was not depicted inside the church. The eastern and northern walls were decorated with standing apostles, the only place for the hypothetical depiction of St Ladislas being the triumphal arch’s northern pillar, i.e., as St Sigismund’s counterpart.91
In his Bohemian iconography, St Sigismund was depicted as a middle-aged holy king, dressed in royal garments and holding scepter and orb, though not having other distinguishing attributes. However, in the recently discovered murals of the church in Bádok (Bădeşti, Romania), which were painted around 1400 on the lower register of the nave’s northern wall,92 St Sigismund was depicted also under a knightly guise (Fig. 7). His partially preserved figure shows a full-armored knight holding a white shield decorated with a red cross in his right hand, whereas his left hand, bent in front of his chest, probably held an orb (now destroyed). The saint’s features are no longer preserved, his head having been intentionally damaged at some later point; however, the upper side of the damaged area has the shape of a crown, which the holy knight originally had on his head.93 If it were not for the accompanying inscription that clearly reads S(ANCTVS)·SIGIS/MVND(VS), this holy warrior would easily pass for St Ladislas due to his pronounced knightly appearance. It was probably the iconographic type of this popular Hungarian patron that the painter of the small rural church used when conceiving the appearance of the new saint, whose cult was only emerging in medieval Hungary.94 However, St Sigismund is depicted in Bádok as part of a series composed of St Catherine of Alexandria, St Helena, St John the Baptist, and the Madonna with Child, a sign that he was not exclusively associated with Hungary’s holy kings.95
As attested by the above-discussed murals, St Sigismund of Burgundy could be depicted either as a holy king or a holy knight and could be placed in the company of either sancti reges Hungariae or other popular saints. His image in these churches reflects his certain popularity at the turn of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. By looking at the donors of the frescoes whenever such information is available, one can hypothetically reconstruct the transfer of St Sigismund’s cult from the royal level to that of the nobility. Nicholas Apafi, the donor of the frescoes in Almakerék, was aule miles (1410–41), comes of Vranduk, Srebrenik, Dubočac (1414–18), and Biertan (1418–40), his presence being attested in Constance during King Sigismund’s stay for the council (1418). Sigismund then issued a series of charters granting privileges to Biertan and confirming some land possessions inherited by the wife of Nicholas, himself called fidelis noster dilectus egregius miles Nicolaus filius Apa de Almakerek and commended for his great bravery and remarkable assistance during the king’s military campaigns in Bosnia.96 Present then in Constance was also Ladislas Csetneki, the commissioner of the murals in Csetnek, who was an illustrious prelate holding throughout his career the ecclesiastical offices of Canon of Esztergom (from 1397), Provost of Budafelhévíz and Esztergom-Zöldmező (1408–24), governor of the Archdiocese of Esztergom (1420, 1439), comes of the royal chapel (1423), chancellor to the queen (1432–37), and Bishop of Nyitra (1439–48).97 Whereas almost no information has survived on the notables of Bádok (and Zsíp), it is known that the owners of Lónya belonged at the turn of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries to the kingdom’s lower nobility.98 One can also add to these figures that of Nicholas Zámbó de Mezőlak, Master of the Treasury and early supporter of Sigismund of Luxemburg, who dedicated his monastic foundation in Kysbathe (Gerchen) to both St Ladislas and St Sigismund, i.e., precisely to the patrons of the country and the future king. Consequently, the presence of St Sigismund in the company of the three sancti reges Hungariae was inspired by the high devotion of Sigismund of Luxemburg for both his personal patron and the kingdom’s holy protectors. This inspired, in turn, a similar piety among the country’s noblemen, who were either in close or distant connection with the king and belonged equally to the higher and lower levels of nobility.99 They emulated the devotional and artistic patterns of the royal court, illustrating in their churches the Hungarian-Bohemian sancta et fidelis societas and being aware of the utmost devotion of the king for St Sigismund. They sometimes made obvious the link between the ruler and his personal patron by lending the features of the former to the latter, as likely happened in Csetnek. That the cult of the Burgundian royal martyr and his representation in the company of Hungary’s holy kings were inspired by King Sigismund’s piety and were determined by the political transformations of the time is likewise obvious from the chronological distribution of the mural ensembles. This coincides exclusively with the reign of Sigismund of Luxemburg and endorses Péter Tóth’s opinion that patronus regis was, in fact, patronus regni at least as long as the king was reigning.100
The reputation of St Sigismund of Burgundy spread to Hungary shortly after the translatio of the saint’s relics to Prague, after which the piety of Hungarian pilgrims travelling abroad was immediately directed toward the new Bohemian patron. However, his cult started to take shape in Hungary only through the consistent efforts of Sigismund of Luxemburg to promote his personal patron throughout his kingdom, acquiring and distributing St Sigismund’s relics across Hungary and founding churches in his honor. It is precisely during the period coinciding with the reign of King Sigismund that the murals bearing representations of St Sigismund were painted: from the late 1300s to the 1420s. The king’s actions to promote his patron saint were meant to establish and ensure the solidity of St Sigismund’s new Hungarian cult and they show striking similarities with those undertaken by the king’s father, Charles IV of Luxemburg. This one managed in only five years to transform St Sigismund into one of his country’s sacred protectors by associating from the beginning the holy newcomer with Bohemia’s traditional patrons, especially St Wenceslas. No direct evidence of joint promotion by the Hungarian king of St Sigismund and the three holy kings has survived, although the king’s reverence for both his personal patron and St Ladislas is undeniable. His obvious emulation of his father’s efficient strategies for promoting the cults of saints makes it highly possible that King Sigismund attempted to establish, like his illustrious parent, a new sancta et fidelis societas within his kingdom, one that was meant to ensure the status of Hungarian patron for St Sigismund. Except for the temporary relocation of the royal martyr’s relics to the cult center of St Ladislas in Nagyvárad and their depiction in the Constance frescoes, there is no other sign of such an explicit association. The possibility cannot be excluded, however, that King Sigismund’s high devotion for the two royal saints made St Sigismund to be placed more than twice in St Ladislas’ holy and faithful companionship and, through him, in that of the other sancti reges Hungariae, the usual iconographic companions of St Ladislas. Only such a situation could make possible the iconographic association of St Sigismund with the holy kings of Hungary during King Sigismund’s reign and his later inclusion among the patron saints of the Hungarian Kingdom in Legende sanctorum regni hungarie in lombardica historia non contente.
Balogh, Jolán. Varadinum. Várad Vára [Varadinum. Nagyvárad Castle]. 2 vols. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1982.
Bräutigam, Günther. “Die Nürnberger Frauenkirche: Idee und Herkunft ihrer Architektur.” In Festschrift für Peter Metz, edited by Ursula Schlegel and Claus Zoege von Manteuffel, 170–97. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1965.
Bunyitay, Vince. A váradi káptalan legrégibb statutumai [The oldest statutes of the chapter of Nagyvárad]. Nagyvárad: n.p., 1886.
Bunyitay, Vince. A váradi püspökség története alapításától a jelenkorig. 1. A váradi püspökok a püspökség alapításától 1566. évig [History of the Nagyvárad Bishopric from its foundation to the present day. 1. Nagyvárad Bishops from the Bishopric’s foundation until 1566]. Nagyvárad: n.p., 1883.
Buzás, Gergely, and István Feld, eds. A budai Szent Zsigmond templom és gótikus szobrai: Kiállítási katalógus [The St Sigismund Church in Buda and its Gothic sculptures. Exhibition catalogue]. Budapest: BTM, 1996.
Chadraba, Rudolf. “Kaiser Karls IV. devotio antiqua.” Mediaevalia Bohemica 1 (1969): 51–69:
Crossley, Paul. “Our Lady in Nuremberg, All Saints Chapel in Prague, and the High Choir of Prague Cathedral.” In Prague and Bohemia: Medieval Art, Architecture and Cultural Exchange in Central Europe, edited by Zoë Opačić, 64–80. Leeds: Maney Publishing, 2009.
Crossley, Paul. “The Politics of Presentation: The Architecture of Charles IV of Bohemia.” In Courts and Regions in Medieval Europe, edited by Sarah Rees Johnes et al., 99–172. Woodbridge: York Medieval Press, 2000.
Divéky, Adorján. Zsigmond lengyel herceg budai számadásai [Accounts of Polish Duke Sigismund in Buda]. Budapest: MTAK, 1914.
Documenta Artis Paulinorum. 3 vols. Budapest: MTA Művészettört. Kut. Csop., 1975 and 1978.
Drăguţ, Vasile. “Picturile murale de la Mediaş: O importantă recuperare pentru istoria artei transilvănene” [Mural paintings of Mediaş: An important recovery for Transylvanian art history]. Revista Muzeelor şi Monumentelor. Monumente Istorice şi de Artă 45, no. 2 (1976): 11–22.
Drăguţ, Vasile. “Picturile murale din biserica evanghelică din Mălîncrav” [Mural paintings in the Evangelical Church in Mălâncrav]. Studii şi Cercetări de Istoria Artei. Seria Artă Plastică 14, no. 1 (1967): 79–93.
Dvořáková, Vlasta, Josef Krása, and Karel Stejskal, eds. Stredoveká nástenná mal’ba na Slovensku [Medieval mural painting in Slovakia]. Prague: Odeon, 1978.
ELTE Egyetemi Könyvtár. Elektronikus könyvek – Kéziratok. ELTE University Library. e-Books – Manuscripts III. Catalogus Manuscriptorum Bibliothecae Reg. Scient. Universitatis Budapestinensis. Tomus II. Pars III. Catalogus Collectionis Kaprinayanae et Supplementa Budapestini 1907. Budapest: n.p. 2006. Accessed January 22, 2016. http://mek.oszk.hu/03500/03518/pdf/catalogus3.pdf.
Engel, Pál. “Az utazó király: Zsigmond itineráriuma” [The traveling King: Sigismund’s itinerary]. In Művészet Zsigmond király korában, 1387–1437 [Art during the age of King Sigismund, 1387–1437], edited by László Beke and Ernő Marosi, 2 vols, 70–92. Budapest: 1987.
Engel, Pál. The Realm of St Stephen. A History of Medieval Hungary, 895–1526. London: I. B. Tauris, 2001.
Fedeles, Tamás. “Ad visitandumque sepulchrum sanctissimi regis Ladislai. Várad kegyhelye a késő középkorban” [Ad visitandumque sepulchrum sanctissimi regis Ladislai. Nagyvárad Shrine during the Late Middle Ages]. In “Köztes-Európa” vonzásában. Ünnepi tanulmányok Font Márta tiszteletére [Attracted by “Inter-Europe”. Festive essays in honor of Márta Font], edited by Dániel Bági, Tamás Fedeles, and Gergely Kiss, 163–82. Pécs: Kronosz, 2012.
Fejér, Georgius. Codex diplomaticvs Hungariae ecclesiasticvs ac civilis. Buda: Typogr. Regiae Vniversitatis Vngaricae, 1841.
Feld, István. “Beszámoló az egykori budai Szent Zsigmond templom és környéke feltárásáról” [Account of the exploration of the former St Sigismund Church in Buda and its surroundings]. Budapest Régiségei 33 (1999): 35–49.
Folz, Robert. Les saints rois du Moyen Âge en Occident (VIe-XIIIe siècles). Brussels: Société des Bollandistes, 1984.
Folz, Robert. “Zur Frage der heiligen Könige: Heiligkeit und Nachleben in der Geschichte des burgundischen Königtums.” Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters 14 (1958): 317–44.
Gleditschivs, Ioannes Ludovicvs, and Mavritivs Georgivs Weidmann, ed. Ioannis Dłvgossi sev Longini Canonici qvondam Cracoviensis, Historiae Polonicae Libri XII. Frankfurt: n.p., 1711.
Gogâltan, Anca. “Patronage and Artistic Production in Transylvania: The Apafis and the Church in Mălâncrav (Fourteenth-Fifteenth Centuries).” PhD diss., CEU, 2003.
Gogâltan, Anca. “The Church in Mălâncrav (Almakerék, Malmkrog) Sibiu District. A Historiographic Overview.” Apulum 37, no. 2 (2000): 305–13.
Gogâltan, Anca. “The Holy Hungarian Kings, the Saint Bishop, and the Saint King in the Sanctuary of the Church at Mălâncrav.” Ars Transsilvaniae 12–13 (2002–2003): 103–21.
Gogâltan, Anca, and Dóra Sallay. “The Church of Mălâncrav/Almakerék and the Holy Blood Chapel of Nicholas Apa.” In Arhitectura religioasă medievală din Transilvania. Középkori egyházi építészet Erdélyben. Medieval Ecclesiastical Architecture in Transylvania, edited by Adrian Andrei Rusu, and Péter Levente Szőcs, 2 vols, 181–210. Satu Mare: Editura Muzeului Sătmărean, 2002.
Gramm, Josef. “Kaiser Sigismund als Stifter der Wandgemälde in der Augustinerkirche zu Konstanz.” Repertorium für Kunstwissenschaft 32 (1909): 391–406.
Gündisch, Gustav, ed. Urkundenbuch zur Geschichte der Deutschen in Siebenbürgen. Vierter Band: 1416–1437. Nummer 1786–2299 mit 6 Tafeln. Sibiu: Krafft & Drotleff, 1937.
Hilsch, Peter. “Die Krönungen Karls IV.” In Kaiser Karl IV. Staatsmann und Mäzen, edited by Ferdinand Seibt, 108–11. Munich: Prestel, 1978.
Homolka, Jaromír. “Ikonografie katedrály sv. Víta v Praze” [Iconography of St Vitus Cathedral in Prague]. Umění/Art 26 (1978): 564–75.
Huszár, Lajos. Münzkatalog Ungarn von 1000 bis Heute. Munich: Ernst Battenberg Verlag, 1979.
Incze, János. “My Kingdom in Pledge. King Sigismund of Luxemburg’s Town Pledging Policy. The Case Studies of Segesd and Bártfa.” MA Thesis, CEU, 2012.
Ipolyi, Arnold, Imre Nagy, and Dezső Véghely, eds. Codex Diplomaticus Patrius Hungaricus. Tomus VII. Budapest: Kocsi Sándor, 1880.
Jenei, Dana. “Les peintures murales de l’église de Mălâncrav. Notes avant la restauration.” Revue Roumaine d’Histoire de l’Art. Série Beaux-Arts 52 (2015): 47–76.
Jékely, Zsombor. “A Kolozs megyei Bádok falképei és az erdélyi falfestészet” [Wall paintings of Bádok/Bădeşti in Cluj County and Transylvanian mural painting]. In Colligite Fragmenta! Örökségvédelem Erdélyben [Colligite Fragmenta! Cultural heritage in Transylvania], edited by Tímea N. Kiss, 194–208. Budapest: ELTE BTK, 2010).
Jékely, Zsombor. “Les ateliers de peinture murale en Transylvanie autour de 1400.” Ars Transsilvaniae 23 (2013): 31–54.
Jékely, Zsombor. “Regions and Interregional Connections. A Group of Frescoes in the Kingdom of Hungary around 1420.” Ars 40, no. 2 (2007): 157–67.
Jékely, Zsombor, and József Lángi. Falfestészeti emlékek a középkori Magyarország északkeleti megyéiből [Remnants of wall painting in the Northeastern counties of medieval Hungary]. Budapest: Teleki László Alapítvány, 2009.
Jékely, Zsombor, and Loránd Kiss. Középkori falképek Erdélyben. Értékmentés a Teleki László Alapítvány támogatásával [Medieval wall paintings in Transylvania. Rescued with the support of the László Teleki Foundation]. Budapest: Teleki László Alapítvány, 2008.
Karácsonyi, János. Die ersten Lónyay. Bratislava: n.p., 1912.
Kárpáti, Zoltán. “A Szent Zsigmond-templom és környéke. Régészeti jelentés” [The St Sigismund Church and its surroundings. Archaeological report]. Tanulmányok Budapesti Múltjából 31 (2003): 205–40.
Kerny, Terézia. “A magyar szent királyok tisztelete és ikonográfiája a XIII. századtól a XVII. századig” [The cult and iconography of Hungarian Holy Kings from the thirteenth century to the seventeenth century]. In Az ezeréves ifjú. Tanulmányok szent Imre herceg 1000 évéről [The thousand-year-old youth. Studies on the thousand years of Duke St Emeric], edited by Tamás Lőrincz, 80–123. Székesfehérvár: Szent Imre templom, 2007.
Kerny, Terézia. “A magyar szent királyok tisztelete és ikonográfiája a XIV. század közepéig” [Cult and iconography of Hungarian Holy Kings until the middle of the fourteenth century]. In Szent Imre 1000 éve. Tanulmányok Szent Imre tiszteletére születésének ezredik évfordulója alkalmából. 1000 Jahre heiliger Emmerich. Beiträge zu Ehren des heiligen Emmerich anläßlich seines 1000. Geburstages, edited by idem, 73–82. Székesfehérvár: Székesfehérvári Egyházmegyei Múzeum, 2007.
Kerny, Terézia. “Begräbnis und Begräbnisstätte von König Sigismund.” In Sigismundus rex et imperator: Kunst und Kultur zur Zeit Sigismund von Luxemburg 1387–1437. Ausstellungskatalog, edited by Imre Takács, 475–79. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern Verlag, 2006.
Kerny, Terézia. “Szent László kultusz a Zsigmond-korban” [The cult of St Ladislas during the age of Sigismund]. In Művészet Zsigmond király korában, 1387–1437 [Art during the age of King Sigismund, 1387–1437], edited by László Beke and Ernő Marosi, 2 vols, 353–63. Budapest: Budapesti Történeti Múzeum 1987.
Kerny, Terézia. “Zsigmond király halála, temetése és síremléke Tinódi Sebestyén Zsigmond király és czászárnak krónikája című költeményében” [The death, burial and tombstone of King Sigismund in Sebestyén Tinódi’s Verse Chronicle of King and Emperor Sigismund]. In Tinódi Sebestyén és a magyar verses epika. A 2006. évi budapesti és kolozsvári Tinódi-konferenciák előadásai [Sebestyén Tinódi and Hungarian verse epics. Proceedings of the Tinódi Conference in Budapest and Cluj-Napoca], edited by István Csörsz Rumen, 143–59. Cluj-Napoca: Kriterion, 2008.
Kéry, Bertalan. Kaiser Sigismund. Ikonographie. Vienna: Schroll, 1972.
Klaniczay, Gábor. Holy Rulers and Blessed Princesses: Dynastic Cults in Medieval Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Klaniczay, Gábor. “La noblesse et le culte des saints dynastiques sous les rois Angevins.” In La noblesse dans les territoires Angevins à la fin du Moyen Âge: Actes du colloque international organisé par l’Université d’Angers: Angers-Saumur, 3–6 juin 1998, edited by Noël Coulet and Jean-Michel Matz, 511–26. Rome: École française de Rome, 2000.
Kumorovitz, Bernát L. “A budai várkápolna és Szent Zsigmond-prépostság történetéhez” [With regard to the history of the Buda Castle Chapel and the St Sigismund Provostry]. Tanulmányok Budapest Múltjából 15 (1963): 109–51.
Kumorovitz, Bernát L., ed. Monumenta Diplomatica Civitatis Budapest. Tomus Tertius (1382–1439). Budapest: BTM, 1987.
Laszlovszky, József. “The Royal Palace in the Sigismund Period and the Franciscan Friary at Visegrád: Royal Residence and the Foundation of Religious Houses”. In The Medieval Royal Palace at Visegrád, edited by Gergely Buzás and József Laszlovszky, 207–18. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 2013.
Lángi, József. “Előzetes beszámoló a lónyai református templom falképeinek kutatásáról, feltásáról” [Preliminary report on the research and exploration of wall paintings at the Calvinist Church in Lónya]. Műemlékvédelem 48 (2004): 357–74.
László, Gyula. “Szent László győri ereklyetartó mellszobráról” [Statue reliquary of St Ladislas in Győr]. Arrabona 7 (1966): 157–209.
Leidinger, Georg, ed., Veit Arnpeck, sämtliche Chroniken. Munich: M. Rieger’sche Universitäts-Buchhandlung, 1915.
Lukcsics, Pál, ed. Monumenta Hungariae Italica. Diplomata pontificum saec. XV. Tomus 2. Eugenius Papa IV (1431–1447), Nicolaus Papa V (1447–1455). Budapest: MTAK, 1938.
Machilek, Franz. “Privatfrömmigkeit und Staatsfrömmigkeit.” In Kaiser Karl IV. Staatsmann und Mäzen, edited by Ferdinand Seibt, 87–101. Munich: Prestel, 1978.
Madas, Edit. “La Légende dorée – Historia lombardica – en Hongrie.” In Spiritualità e lettere nella cultura italiana e ungherese del basso medioevo, edited by Sante Graciotti and Cesare Vasoli, 53–61. Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 1995.
Marosi, Ernő. “A XIV-XV. századi magyarországi művészet európai helyzetének néhány kérdése” [A few questions regarding fourteenth- and fifteenth-century Hungarian art in European context]. Ars Hungarica 1 (1973): 25–66.
Marosi, Ernő. “Saints at Home and Abroad: Some Observations on the Creation of Iconographic Types in Hungary in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries.” In Promoting the Saints: Cults and Their Contexts from Late Antiquity until the Early Modern Period. Essays in Honor of Gábor Klaniczay for His 60th Birthday, edited by Ottó Gecser et al., 175–206. Budapest: CEU Press, 2011.
Marosi, Ernő. “Újabb Zsigmond-portrék” [Further Sigismund portraits]. In Horler Miklós hetvenedik születésnapjára tanulmányok [Studies for Miklós Horler’s seventieth birthday], edited by Pál Lővei, 133–41. Budapest: Országos Műemlékvédelmi Hivatal, 1993.
Maué, Hermann. “Nuremberg’s Cityscape and Architecture.” In Gothic and Renaissance Art in Nuremberg 1300–1550, 27–50. Munich: Prestel-Verlag, 1986.
Mengel, David Ch. “A Holy and Faithful Fellowship: Royal Saints in Fourteenth-century Prague.” In Evropa a Čechy na konci středovĕku. Sborník příspĕkvů vĕnovaných Františku Šmahelovi [Europe and Bohemia at the end of the Middle Ages. Conference proceedings dedicated to František Šmahelov], edited by Eva Doležalová, Robert Novotný, and Pavel Soukup, 145–58. Prague: Centrum Medievistických Studií, 2004.
Mengel, David Ch. “Bones, Stones, and Brothels: Religion and Topography in Prague under Emperor Charles IV (1346–78).” PhD diss., University of Notre Dame, 2003.
Mengel, David Ch. “Remembering Bohemia’s Forgotten Patron Saint.” In The Bohemian Reformation and Religious Practice. Papers from the Sixth International Symposium on the Bohemian Reformation and Religious Practice Sponsored by the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Held at Vila Lana, Prague 23–25 June 2004, edited by Zdenek V. David and David R. Holeton, 17–32. Prague: Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Main Library, 2007.
Mezey, László, ed. Codices Latini medii aevi Bibliothecae Universitatis Budapestinensis. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1961.
Mező, András. A templomcím a magyar helységnevekben (11–15. század) [Church dedication in Hungarian place names (eleventh to fifteenth century)]. Budapest: METEM, 1996.
Mező, András. Patrocíniumok a középkori Magyarországon [Patrocinia in medieval Hungary]. Budapest: METEM, 2003.
“Miracula sancti Sigismondi martyris, per ipsum in sanctam Pragensem ecclesiam manifeste demonstrata.” In Catalogus codicum hagiographicorum latinorum antiquiorum saeculo XVI qui asservantur in Bibliotheca Nationali Parisiensi ediderunt Hagiographi Bollandiani. 3 vols, 462–69. Brussels: Société des Bollandistes, 1893.
Molnár, István. “A magyarországi pálosok Zöld Kódex-ének Somogy megyei regesztái” [Somogy County regests of the Green Codex of the Hungarian Paulines]. Somogyi Múzeumok Közleményei 2 (1975): 217–233.
Monumenta Vaticana historiam regni Hungariae illustrantia. Series 1. 4 vols. Budapest: Franklin-Társulat Nyomdája, 1889.
Nagy, Iván. Magyarország családai czimerekkel és nemzékrendi táblákkal [Families of Hungary with coats of arms and chronological tables]. 12 vols. Pest: Nyomatott Beimel J. és Kozma Vazulnál, 1860.
Năstăsoiu, Dragoş Gh. “A Holy Bishop among Holy Kings in the Frescoes of Mălâncrav.” Forthcoming Transylvanian Review/Revue de Transylvanie 25 (2016).
Năstăsoiu, Dragoş Gh. “Political Aspects of the Mural Representations of sancti reges Hungariae in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries.” Annual of Medieval Studies at CEU 16 (2010): 93–119.
Năstăsoiu, Dragoş-Gheorghe. “Sancti reges Hungariae in Mural Painting of Late-medieval Hungary.” MA Thesis, CEU, 2009.
Neumann, Tibor, ed. Bereg megye hatóságnak oklevelei (1299–1526) [Authorities’ charters of Bereg County (1299–1526)]. Nyíregyháza: Kiadja a Móricz Zsigmond Könyvtár, 2006.
Otavský, Karel. “Reliquien im Besitz Kaisers Karl IV., ihre Verehrung und ihre Fassungen.” In Court Chapels of the High and Late Middle Ages and Their Artistic Decoration, edited by Jiří Fajt, 129–41, 392–98. Prague: Národní Galerie, 2003.
Paxton, Frederick S. “Liturgy and Healing in an Early Medieval Saint’s Cult: The Mass in honore sancti Sigismundi for the Cure of Fevers.” Traditio 49 (1994): 23–43.
Paxton, Frederick S. “Power and the Power to Heal. The Cult of St Sigismund of Burgundy.” Early Medieval Europe 2 (1993): 95–110.
Piqué, Francesca and Dusan Stulik, ed. Conservation of the Last Judgment Mosaic, St. Vitus Cathedral, Prague. Los Angeles: Getty Publications, 2005.
Podlaha, Anton, and Eduard Šittler. Chrámový poklad u sv. Víta v Praze. Jeho dĕjiny a popis [Treasury of the St Vitus Cathedral in Prague. Its history and description]. Prague: Nákladem dĕdictví sv. Prokopa, 1903.
Polc, Jaroslav. “Zapomenutý český patron” [The forgotten Czech Patron]. In Se znamením kříže [In the sign of the cross], edited by František Dvorník, 127–31. Rome: Křest’anská akademie v Římĕ, 1967.
Poszler, Györgyi. “Az Árpád-házi szent királyok a magyar középkor századaiban” [Holy kings of the Árpád House in the Hungarian Middle Ages]. In Történelem – kép. Szemelvények múlt és művészet kapcsolatából Magyarországon. Geschichte – Geschichtsbild. Die Beziehung von Vergangenheit und Kunst in Ungarn, edited by Árpád Mikó and Katalin Sinkó, 170–87. Budapest: Magyar Nemzeti Galéria, 2000.
Prokopp, Mária. Középkori freskók Gömörben [Medieval frescoes in Gömör County]. Šamorín: Méry Ratio, 2002.
Prüss, Johann. Lege[n]de S[an]cto[rum] regni Hungarie in lombardica historia non co[n]tente. Strasbourg: 1484–1487. Accessed January 21, 2016. https://digitalis.uc.pt/en/fundo_antigo/legende_sanctorum_regni_hungarie_lombardica_historia_non_contente/.
Radocsay, Dénes. A középkori Magyarország táblaképei [Panel paintings of medieval Hungary]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1955.
Radó, Polykarpus, ed. Libri liturgici manu scripti bibliothecarum Hungariae. Budapest: OSZK, 1947.
Rosario, Iva. Art and Propaganda. Charles IV of Bohemia, 1346–1378. Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2000.
Schleif, Corine. “Hands That Appoint, Anoint and Ally: Late Medieval Donor Strategies for Appropriating Approbation through Painting.” Art History 16, no. 1 (1993): 1–32.
Schneider, Reinhard. “Karolus, qui et Wenceslaus.” In Festschrift für Helmut Beumann zum 65. Geburtstag, edited by Kurt-Ulrich Jäschke and Reinhard Wenskus, 365–87. Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke, 1977.
Srovnal, Filip. “Kult svatého Václava při norimberské Frauenkirche” [St Wenceslas’ cult in Nuremberg Frauenkirche]. In Ve službách českých knížat a králů. Kniha c poctě profesora Jiříjo Kuthana [In service of Czech princes and kings. Book in honor of Professor Jiří Kuthan], edited by Miroslav Šmied and František Záruba, 233–48. Prague: NLN, 2013.
Stoob, Heinz. Kaiser Karl IV. und seine Zeit. Graz: Styria, 1990.
Studničková, Milada. “Kult svatého Zikmunda v Čechách” [St Sigismund’s cult in Bohemia]. In Svĕtci a jejich kult ve středovĕku [Saints and their cults in the Middle Ages], edited by Petr Kubín, Hana Pátková, and Tomáš Petráček, 283–323. České Budĕjovice: Ústav dĕjin křest’anského umĕní Katolické teologické fakulty Univerzity Karlovy v Praze, 2006.
Studničková, Milada. “Sancta et fidelis societas: Svaté a vĕrné společenství sv. Václava a sv. Zikmunda v pražské katedrále sv. Víta” [Sancta et fidelis societas. Holy and faithful fellowship of St Wenceslas and St Sigismund in St Vitus Cathedral in Prague]. In Čechy jsou plné kostelů. Boemia plena est ecclesiis. Kniha k poctĕ PhDr. Anežky Merhatutové, DrSc. [Bohemia is full of churches. Bohemia plena est ecclesiis. Book in honor of PhD Anežka Merhautová, DrSc.], edited by idem, 446–53. Prague: NLN, 2010.
Szabó, George. “Emperor Sigismund with St Sigismund and St Ladislaus: Notes on a Fifteenth-century Austrian Drawing.” Master Drawings 5, no. 1 (1967): 24–31 and 85.
Szakács, Béla Zsolt. “Saints of the Knights – Knights of the Saints: Patterns of Patronage at the Court of Sigismund.” In Sigismund von Luxemburg: ein Kaiser in Europa. Tagungsband des internationalen historischen und kunstshistorischen Kongresses in Luxemburg, 8–10. Juni 2005, edited by Michel Pauly and François Reinert, 319–30. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern Verlag, 2006.
Tadra, Ferdinand. “Cancellaria Johannis Noviforensis Episcopi Olomucensis (1364–1380). Briefe und Urkunden des Olmützer Bischofs Johann von Neumarkt.” Archiv für österreichische Geschichte 86, no. 1 (1886): 1–157.
Takács, Imre, ed. Sigismundus rex et imperator: Kunst und Kultur zur Zeit Sigismund von Luxemburg 1387–1437. Ausstellungskatalog. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern, 2006.
Tátrai, Vilmos. “Die Darstellung Sigismunds von Luxemburg in der italiensichen Kunst seiner Zeit.” In Sigismundus rex et imperator: Kunst und Kultur zur Zeit Sigismund von Luxemburg 1387–1437. Ausstellungskatalog, edited by Imre Takács, 143–52. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern Verlag, 2006.
Togner, Milan. “Nástenné maľby v Štítniku” [Wall paintings in Štítnik]. In Gotika: Dejiny slovenského výtvarného umenia, edited by Dušan Buran, 687–89. Bratislava: Slovenská Národná Galéria, 2003.
Tóth, Péter, ed. Catalogus Codicum Latinorum Medii Aevi Bibliothecae Universitatis Budapestinensis. Budapest: 2008. Accessed January 21, 2016. http://www.manuscripta-mediaevalia.de/hs/kataloge/budapest.pdf.
Tóth, Péter. “Patronus regis–patronus regni: Kaiser Sigismund und die Verehrung des heiligen Sigismund in Ungarn.” Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 1 (2008): 80–96.
Végh, András. “Adatok a budai kisebb Szűz Mária, más néven Szent Zsigmond templom alapításának történetéhez” [Data on the foundation history of the Minor Virgin Mary Church, also known as the St Sigismund Church]. Budapest Régiségei 33 (1999): 25–34.
Wenzel, Gusztáv, ed. Codex diplom. Arpadianus continuatus, 12 vols. Budapest: Eggenberger Ferdinánd M. Akadémiai Könyvárus, 1874.
1 Klaniczay, Holy Rulers.
2 Kéry, Kaiser Sigismund, 41–52.
3 Tóth, “Patronus regis,” 80–96.
4 For Sigismund’s life and early cult, see: Folz, “Heiligen Könige,” 317–44; idem, Saints rois, 23–25; Paxton, “Power,” 95–110; idem, “Liturgy and Healing,” 23–43.
5 Ibid., 23–43.
6 Folz, “Heiligen Könige,” 340–341; Paxton, “Liturgy and Healing,” 26, 33.
7 For Charles’ passion for relics, see: Chadraba, “Devotio antiqua,” 51–69; Machilek, “Privatfrömmigkeit,” 87–101; Mengel, “Bones, Stones,” 263–372; Otavský, “Reliquien,” 129–41, 392–98. For his political propaganda through royal saints’ cult and associated works of art, see: Rosario, Art and Propaganda; Crossley, “Politics of Presentation,” 99–172.
8 Mengel, “Bones, Stones,” 327–28.
9 For the political significance of Charles’ sixth coronation, which made him the personal ruler of all the kingdoms of his empire, see: Machilek, “Privatfrömmigkeit,” 99; Hilsch, “Krönungen,” 111; Stoob, Kaiser Karl IV, 207–23.
10 Mengel, “Bones, Stones,” 332–36.
11 For Sigismund as Bohemian patron, see: Polc, “Zapomenutý patron,” 127–31; Mengel, “Remembering,” 17–32; Studničková, “Kult Sigismund,” 299–339.
12 Mengel, “Holy and Faithful,” 145–58.
13 “. . . Quis dubitet sanctissimum patronum nostrum Wenczeslaum apud Deum sanctum Sigismondum sibi obtinuisse in socium, qui adhuc positus in humanis sanctum sibi impetravit et vicum. O sancta et fidelis societas, que nullo potuit violari certamine, quaeque adunata corporibus pro delictis populorum staret et mente . . . ,” National Library of France, Paris, NAL 1510, published in “Miracula sancti Sigismondi,” 463.
14 For the cult of Wenceslas, see Klaniczay, Holy Rulers, 101–08, 163–67, 329–31, 347–48, with bibliography.
15 Mengel, “Holy and Faithful,” 148–50. For Wenceslas’ and Sigismund’s sancta et fidelis societas in art, see: Studničková, “Sancta et fidelis societas,” 446–53. The lines connecting St Sigismund’s and St Wenceslas’ chapels with the shrine of St Vitus and the planned tomb of St Adalbert formed the arms of a cross, which had the relics of the four Bohemian patrons at its ends, Homolka, “Ikonografie sv. Víta,” 566.
16 Mengel, “Bones, Stones,” 339–40.
17 “Miracula sancti Sigismondi,” 462–69. Mengel analyzes the 31 miracles that occurred just in the first four months after the transfer of the relics; see “Bones, Stones,” 352–70.
18 Both miracles attest to the familiarity of the cured ones with Sigismund’s specialized healing power, ibid., 357–58, 371. When Charles fell ill, his wife vowed to walk the distance of around 30 kilometers from Karlštejn to Prague to express her piety at St Sigismund’s shrine; she then donated a large amount of gold to be used for adorning the saint’s skull, Studničková, “Kult Sigismund,” 307–08.
19 Charles’ first son was named after the patron of Bohemia, St Wenceslas. For Charles’ naming practice, see: Machilek, “Privatfrömmigkeit,” 88–92; Klaniczay, Holy Rulers, 330–31.
20 Mengel, “Bones, Stones,” 341.
21 For these works, see: Schleif, “Hands,” 9–15; Piqué and Stulik, Conservation.
22 Tóth, “Patronus regis,” 80–96.
23 Ibid., 85.
24 Doc. no. 508, Wenzel, Codex diplom., 12: 642.
25 Podlaha and Šittler, Chrámový poklad, XXIX.
26 Bunyitay, Váradi káptalan, 74; the altar is mentioned again in 1423 and 1437, Balogh, Varadinum, 2: 36, 44, 278.
27 Doc. no. 121 (352), Tadra, “Cancellaria,” 101. For Sigismund’s Olomouc relics preceding the acquisitions of Charles IV, see Studničková, “Kult Sigismund,” 300–01.
28 Radocsay, Középkori táblaképei, 37.
29 Mező, Templomcím, 254; idem, Patrocíniumok, 496. For the double dedication to St Ladislas and St Sigismund of the monastery in Kysbathe/Gerchen (1383–84), see below.
30 Missals kept in the National Széchényi Library, Budapest. For May 2, see: Missale Ecclesiae Hungaricae saec. XIV, Clmae 395; Missale Posoniense (Codex “A”) saec. XIV, Clmae 214; Missale Ecclesiae Polonicae 1379, Clmae 451, Radó, Libri liturgici, 73–74, 77–79, 111–12. For Prague translatio, see: Missale Hungariae Superioris s. XIV, Clmae 93, ibid., 67–69.
31 University Library, Budapest, Iacobus de Voragine: Legenda Aurea. Legendae Sanctorum, Cod. Lat. 44, Mezey, Codices Latini, 65; Madas, “ Légende dorée,” 55–56.
32 Cathedral Library, Esztergom, Missale Posoniense (Codex “I”) saec. XV, LI 7, and National Széchényi Library, Budapest, Missale in usum Balth. Batthyány Capitanei de Kőszeg 1489, Nyelvemlékek 17, Radó, Libri liturgici, 126–32, 169–72.
33 University Library, Budapest, Orationes, Cod. Lat. 109, Tóth, Catalogus Codicum.
34 Prüss, Lege[n]de.
35 Madas, “Légende dorée,” 59–60.
36 The collection includes, in the calendar’s order, other saints and feasts relevant for medieval Hungary. For Sigismund’s vita, see Prüss, Lege[n]de, fols. 3r-4r.
37 Folz, “Heiligen Könige,” 338.
38 Doc. no. 553–54, Kumorovitz, Monumenta, 3: 287–88.
39 For the church’s history, see: idem, “Budai várkápolna,” 109–51; Végh, “Adatok,” 25–34.
40 Ibid., “Adatok,” 25–26.
41 For Nuremberg Frauenkirche, see: Bräutigam, “Nürnberger Frauenkirche,” 170–97; Crossley, “Our Lady,” 64–80.
42 For the Nuremberg Jewish quarter, see: Maué, “Nuremberg’s,” 34–35. For the Jewish quarter in Buda, see: Feld, “Beszámoló,” 35–49; Kárpáti, “Szent Zsigmond,” 205–40.
43 Végh, “Adatok,” 25–26. For the church’s fragmentary sculptures, see: Gergely Buzás and István Feld, A budai Szent Zsigmond templom és gótikus szobrai.
44 Végh, “Adatok,” 25–34; Kumorovitz, “Budai várkápolna,” 109–51.
45 Ibid., 113–21.
46 Charles was named Wenceslas at birth (1316), but was re-Christened Charles during his confirmation (1323) by his uncle, Charles IV the Fair of France, at whose court Charles was educated, Schneider, “Karolus,” 365–87. For the cult of Wenceslas in Nuremberg, see: Srovnal, “Kult svatého Václava,” 233–48.
47 Copiae Henrici Macognini de Petra canonici Agaunensis anno 1634–35, bookcase no. 19, fols. 36/33r-38/35r, Historical Archives of the Abbey of Saint-Maurice d’Agaune, text published in Tóth, “Patronus regis,” 94–96.
48 Ibid., 95. For identifying its location, see: Laszlovszky, “Royal Palace,” 213–18.
49 Tóth, “Patronus regis,” 92.
50 “…sed duci petivit devotissime et ardenter ad ecclesiam dicti Sancti Sigismondi, ob cuius reverentiam sic vocatur, quem sanctum visitaverat inclytae memoriae dictus eius genitor, unde caput exportavit, qui dum rediret ad partes sui Regni Boemiae invenit foelicissimam augustam quae enixerat et peperat praelibatum eius inclytum genitum, quem vocari voluit Sigismondum ob reverentiam Sancti antedicti.” Ibid., 94.
51 “…praefatus vero dominus dominus noster foelix accedens ad praelibati foelicissimae memoriae Augusti sui genitoris devotionem, et volens et ardenter cupiens ex causis praemissis, in exaltationem nominis Sancti Sigismondi, devotionem et statum ecclesiae augmentum, ut de eiusdem sancti devotissimis orationibus apud Altissimum sit protinus gaudens…,” ibid., 95.
52 Ibid., 95–96.
53 Végh, “Adatok,” 26–27.
54 After attending the evening service in the royal chapter’s church on January 5, 1501, Polish Duke Sigismund Jagiełło was allowed to venerate its relics, though the reference is generic, Divéky, Zsigmond, 85.
55 Information occurring in a late-fifteenth-century source, Veit Arnpeck’s Chronica Baioariorum (1491–95), Leidinger, Veit Arnpeck, 200. This isolated occurrence led to assumptions that the relics either returned afterward to Prague, Végh, “Adatok,” 27, or have never been to Nagyvárad, Tóth, “Patronus regis,” 88.
56 For Sigismund’s veneration of St Ladislas, see: Kerny, “Szent László,” 355; eadem, “Begräbnis,” 475–76; Szakács, “Saints of the Knights,” 319–20.
57 Sigismund’s presence in Nagyvárad is recorded fifteen times between 1387 and 1426, Engel, “Utazó király,” 70–71.
58 Nagyvárad Cathedral as Mary’s burial site appears first in a 1401 royal donation charter, doc. no. I, Fejér, Codex diplomaticvs, 4: 54–55.
59 For the 1401 papal letters following Sigismund’s request, see Monumenta Vaticana, 1: 347–48, 367, 373. For the 1434 papal indulgences, see Lukcsics, Monumenta Hungariae Italica, 2: 333, 347.
60 Gleditschivs and Weidmann, Ioannis Dłvgossi, 327; docs. nos. CL-CLII, Fejér, Codex diplomaticvs, 5: 343–44.
61 For the Győr reliquary, its debated dating and its bibliography, see: Cat. no. 4.91, in Takács, Sigismundus, 378–82; László, “Szent László,” 157–209. For the 1406 confirmations, see docs. nos. CCXXXIII–CCXXXV, Fejér, Codex diplomaticvs, 4: 518–28; for the 1407 donations, see doc. no. CCXCII, ibid., 613–14. See also: Bunyitay, Váradi püspökség, 1: 227; Balogh, Varadinum, 2:42–43.
62 Doc. no. CCXXXIII, Fejér, Codex diplomaticvs, 4:519–20.
63 For Sigismund’s burial, see: Kerny, “Begräbnis,” 475–79; idem, “Zsigmond halála,” 143–59.
64 Cat. nos. 572–74, 584–85, Huszár, Münzkatalog, 93–95.
65 For this document, see: ELTE Egyetemi Könyvtár.
66 For these frescoes, see: Kéry, Kaiser Sigismund, 44–46; Cat. no. 2.12, in Takács, Sigismundus, 161–62.
67 Gramm, “Kaiser Sigismund,” 391–406, reports also that the Austrian and Hungarian coat of arms appeared once and twice, respectively, next to the painted figures; it is possible, therefore, that another Hungarian holy king was included initially in the series of saints, but this can no longer be identified.
68 Molnár, “Zöld Kódex,” 219–20; Documenta Artis Paulinorum, 2:209, and 3:31–35. For Nicholas Zámbó’s career, see Incze, “My Kingdom in Pledge,” 31–34.
69 Engel, Realm of St Stephen, 196–97.
70 Năstăsoiu, “Sancti reges,” 26–30; idem, “Political Aspects,” 94–100.
71 Klaniczay, “Noblesse,” 511–26; Szakács, “Saints of the Knights,” 319–30.
72 The powerful symbol of St Ladislas was used against the king in 1402, when the Hungarian aristocracy conspired against Sigismund of Luxemburg and swore an oath on the saint’s relics; the anti-Sigismund coalition supported the claim of Ladislas of Naples to the Hungarian throne. Doc. no. 401, Ipolyi, Codex Diplomaticus, 7: 439–40; Bunyitay, Váradi püspökség, 1: 221.
73 Such cases are discussed in Năstăsoiu, “Sancti reges,” 49, 55, 63, 68.
74 For this iconography, see: Poszler, “Árpád-házi szent,” 170–87; Gogâltan, “Holy Kings,” 103–21; Kerny, “Magyar szent XIII.–XVII.,” 80–123; Năstăsoiu, “Sancti reges;” idem, “Political Aspects,” 93–119. For other studies, see below.
75 For their cults, see Klaniczay, Holy Rulers, 114–294.
76 Năstăsoiu, “Political Aspects,” 101.
77 There is the tendency to place St Stephen centrally, but there are also exceptions, idem, “Sancti reges,” 74, 77, 88.
78 Marosi, “XIV–XV. századi,” 34–36; Kerny, “Magyar szent XIV,” 75–76.
79 Năstăsoiu, “Sancti reges,” 45–65, 72–93; idem, “Political Aspects,” 100–19.
80 Idem, “Sancti reges,” 55–62, 75, 80, 84, 89, 91–92; idem, “Political Aspects,” 107–14.
81 For the church’s bibliography up to 2000, see Gogâltan, “Church in Mălâncrav,” 305–13. For the Apafis’ artistic patronage, see: eadem, “Patronage;” eadem and Sallay, “Church of Mălâncrav,” 2:181–210. For the murals’ recent overview, see: Jenei, “Peintures murales,” 47–76.
82 For the complex issue of the holy bishop’s identity, see: Năstăsoiu, “Holy Bishop.”
83 Gogâltan, “Holy Kings,” 114.
84 Identified initially with St Louis IX of France, Drăguţ, “Mălîncrav,” 87–88; idem, “Mediaş,” 13–14. The Transylvanian analogies upon which he relied (Beszterce, Medgyes, Marosszentkirály, Marosszentanna, and Szék) are, in fact, holy kings, whom are difficult to identify in absence of inscriptions and personal attributes. An exception is the holy king in Szék, who holds a ring and raven, the attributes of St Oswald, King of Northumbria, who appears also in the recently uncovered murals in Szászivánfalva that were executed by the same workshop that produced the sanctuary frescoes in Almakerék; however, the fourth holy king in Almakerék cannot be St Oswald, due to his lack of personal attributes.
85 Gogâltan, “Holy Kings,” 117–21.
86 Studničková, “Kult Sigismund,” 299–39; idem, “Kult Zikmunda,” 283–23; idem, “Sancta et fidelis,” 446–53.
87 For the murals’ dating and commissioner, see: Dvořáková, Stredoveká mal’ba, 154–60; Prokopp, Középkori freskók, 31–40; Togner, “Nástenné maľby,” 687–89.
88 Detail encountered in the court costume of the saint facing him; the military costumes in the upper registers are tight.
89 Sigismund of Luxemburg was identified visually with his personal patron, the emperor’s iconography crossing often the borderline between the sacred and profane, between religious piety and personal representation, Kéry, Kaiser Sigismund, 41–52. For other examples, see: Marosi, “Zsigmond-portrék,” 133–41; idem, “Saints at Home,” 197–98; Szabó, “Emperor Sigismund,” 24–31, 85; Tátrai, “Darstellung Sigismunds,” 143–52; Cat. no. 2.12, in Takács, Sigismundus, 161–62.
90 Lángi, “Előzetes beszámoló,” 357–74; Jékely and Lángi, Falfestészeti emlékek, 184–213, 457.
91 Năstăsoiu, “Sancti reges,” 57–58, 69, 80; idem, “Political Aspects,” 114. The corresponding layer of paint fell down in this area, making visible the sanctuary’s earlier decoration; although incompletely preserved, the northern wall’s decoration seems to have consisted entirely of standing apostles.
92 Jékely and Kiss, Középkori falképek, 8–25; Jékely, “Bádok falképei,” 194–208; idem, “Ateliers,” 32–37.
93 A similar, crown-shaped damage on the head of the neighboring St Catherine supports the idea of intentional destruction, for whatever reasons.
94 Marosi, “Saints at Home,” 194–98. Doubting that the painting was executed immediately after 1387, he proposed a dating one quarter of a century later; the figure’s knightly appearance, however, could equally indicate an earlier dating to a period when painters were not very familiar with the new saint’s iconography, copying thus that of St Ladislas. As shown earlier, St Sigismund’s cult made its presence felt in Hungary in the 1370s–1380s; subsequently, the dating of the frescoes before 1400 is highly possible.
95 Another fragmentarily preserved example can be added hypothetically to this list. In the early- fifteenth-century murals of the church in Zsíp, the holy kings on the pillars of the triumphal arch are probably St Ladislas and St Emeric (northern pillar) and another mature holy king with dark hair (southern pillar), a detail which does not fit the iconography of the old, white-haired St Stephen. The paint layer corresponding to St Ladislas’ pendant is completely lost, but iconographic analogies (Zsigra, Tornaszentandrás, Poprád, and possibly Csécs) suggest that St Ladislas could be faced by St Stephen, whereas St Emeric’s pendant, the dark-haired holy king, could be St Sigismund. For a discussion of this case, see Năstăsoiu, “Sancti reges,” 57–58, 60–61, 69, 93; idem, “Political Aspects,” 110–11, 114, 116–17, 119.
96 For Nicholas’ activity, see Gogâltan and Sallay, “Church of Mălâncrav,” 181–86; for the 1418 documents, see doc. no. 1835–37, Gündisch, Urkundenbuch, 63–67.
97 For overviews of his career, see: Prokopp, Középkori freskok, 31–33; Szakács, “Saints of the Knights,” 325; Jékely, “Regions,” 163.
98 Nagy, Magyarország családai, 7: 156–68; Karácsonyi, Ersten Lónyay. See also doc. no. 125, 130, 136–37, 147, 159–61, Neumann, Bereg megye, 63–65, 68, 72.
99 For Hungarian nobility’s devotion for the sancti reges Hungariae, see: Klaniczay, “Noblesse,” 511–26; Szakács, “Saints of the Knights,” 319–30; Fedeles, “Várad kegyhelye,” 163–82.
100 Tóth, “Patronus regis,” 80–96.
Fig. 1 – Holy bishop, St Ladislas, St Stephen, St Sigismund, and St Emeric, either before 1404/5 or 1420s, fresco, middle register of the sanctuary’s southern wall, Lutheran Church in Almakerék (Mălâncrav, Romania)
Fig. 2 – Holy kings, 1420s, fresco, eastern and western pillars of the southern aisle, Lutheran Church in Csetnek (Štítnik, Slovakia)
Fig. 3 – St Sigismund, 1420s, fresco, lower register of the western pillar, Lutheran Church in Štítnik (Slovakia)
Fig. 4 – Drawing with succession of paint layers: (I) holy-king layer, (II) holy-monk layer; lower register of the eastern pillar, Lutheran Church in Štítnik (Slovakia)
Fig. 6 – St Sigismund, 1413, fresco, southern pillar of the triumphal arch, Calvinist Church in Lónya (Hungary)
Fig. 5 – St Emeric and St Stephen (southern wall), and St Sigismund (southern pillar), 1413, fresco, southern wall of the sanctuary, Calvinist Church in Lónya (Hungary)
Fig. 7 – St Sigismund, c. 1400, fresco, lower register of the nave’s northern wall, Calvinist Church in Bádok (Romania)