Call for journal articles – The Hungarian Historical Review

The Hungarian Historical Review welcomes articles, proposals for thematic blocks (3-4 papers), and proposals for entire special issues (5-6 papers) in any topic pertaining to the history of the broadly defined East-Central and Southeastern Europe. Authors of articles are expected to submit their manuscript that consists of 8 to 10 thousand words (including abstract, keywords, notes, and bibliography). Prospective editors of blocks or special issues are expected to submit the titles and abstracts of the papers and a short summary that explains their coherence. All submissions shall be sent to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. More at Submission guidelines.

 

Call for Journal Articles

The Hungarian Historical Review invites submissions for its second issue in 2022, the theme of which will be

Austria-Hungary and the Balkans – from the perspectives of New Imperial History

The deadline for the submission of abstracts: November 15, 2021.

The deadline for the accepted papers: February 15, 2022.

In recent years, the nature of the Habsburg Empire (or Austria-Hungary) and its foreign policy successes and failures have been dramatically reevaluated. Authors such as Schmitt, Göderle, Callaway, and Judson and prominent works in the secondary literature, including the volume edited by Scheer and Ruthner and the Kakanien Revisited online journal, have paved the way for this revised assessment, which, within the framework of New Imperial History, has modified our understandings of the actors, methods, and goals of Austrian foreign policy. This post-colonial approach, which emphasizes the imperial behavior and tendencies towards colonization in Austrian foreign policy, has even yielded significant insights in Hungarian historiography (Tarafás, Varga, Csaplár-Degovics, Egry).

Hirschhausen, one of the most prominent figures of the school of New Imperial History, has claimed that the evolution of a state into an “empire” should not be understood merely as the direct consequence of imperial society and modernization (the modernizing state). Terms such as capitalism and modernization and the economic terminology associated with them should be detached from the interpretation of the empire as a phenomenon. The Ottoman state was in permanent crisis, and preindustrial Tsarist Russia had a similar lifespan as the British Empire. New Imperial History has also challenged the very notion of “Eastern Europe” as a historical concept with the contention that this notion takes refuge in theories of modernization and overestimates the homogenizing effect and historical role of the modern nation state in comparison to the heterogeneous empires.

According to Roger Grigor Suny, empire is an “unjust hierarchy” in which the center rules at the expense of the peripheries (regardless of the competing definitions of the latter). According to Osterhammel’s “negative” definition, the empire is a large, multiethnic, multi-confessional, hierarchized political entity the coherence of which is primarily secured by the rule of the élite based on coercion, administration, internal collaboration, and ideas and symbolics which rest on and encourage a notion of shared identity instead of through political or social homogenization or any equality of civil rights.

What theoretical differences can be observed if the approaches used in and conclusions offered by national history writing are compared to the approaches used by New Imperial History, and where do these two schools overlap? How do the methodologies used in and interpretations offered by imperial research and diplomatic history differ? What are the new findings regarding Austria-Hungary’s behavior in the Balkans from the perspectives of New Imperial History? How has New Imperial History been received among Balkan scholars and Central European authors? We warmly welcome studies focusing on these questions, including theoretical discussions and case studies.

Please send an abstract of no more than 500 words and a short biographical note with a selected list of the author’s three most important publications (we do not accept full CVs) no later than November 15, 2021.

 

Proposals should be submitted to the special editor of the issue by email:

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

The editors will ask the authors of selected papers to submit their final articles (max. 10,000 words) no later than February 15, 2022.

The articles will be published after a double-blind peer-review process. We provide proofreading for contributors who are not native speakers of English.

All articles must conform to our submission guidelines.

The Hungarian Historical Review is a peer-reviewed international quarterly of the social sciences and humanities, the geographical focus of which is Hungary and East-Central Europe. For additional information, including submission guidelines, please visit the journal’s website: www.hunghist.org

 

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Call for Journal Articles

The Hungarian Historical Review invites submissions for its first issue in 2022, the theme of which will be

War and nation-building in East-Central Europe in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries

 

The deadline for the submission of abstracts: May 15, 2021.

The deadline for the accepted papers: September 15, 2021.

In recent decades, studies have argued persuasively that armed conflict and nationalism are firmly linked and many scholars regarded war as one of the main drivers of nation-building. As historians have shown, armed conflict can be used to strengthen the kind of group cohesion on which the concept of the nation relies and also to accelerate the cultural and political processes through which ethnic boundaries (literal and figurative) are drawn.

Armed conflicts also became pivotal elements of many powerful national mythologies. Often, wars recently fought to achieve “national independence” or to “reclaim” or “liberate” territories lost were used as “raw materials” for these myths. In other cases, conflicts from earlier centuries were reframed to serve as elements of foundation myths of the nation. The narratives (re)created concerning these conflicts lost and won helped to legitimize the aspirations of national elites and allowed them to mobilize the population. The links between armed conflict and nationalism have been intensely analyzed in the German, French, and Russian contexts, but they have only rarely been made the subject of scholarly discussion in the Central and Eastern European region. This special issue of the Hungarian Historical Review aims to explore the ways in which armed conflict and values and images associated with armed conflict influenced the region’s nationalisms. It seeks, moreover, to further understandings of how wars contributed to the nation-building processes in the region.

The journal welcomes submissions that look beyond the nation state and examine the role of military conflict in the nation-building processes on the regional and imperial levels. We particularly encourage papers analyzing different cases from a comparative perspective.

The geographical focus of the issue is on Central and Eastern Europe, including the territories of the former Soviet Union. We do not confine ourselves to the strict geographical borders of the region, however, especially in the case of comparative papers.

This special issue particularly welcomes papers discussing the following fields

  • The roles of martial virtues in national self-images in East-Central and Western Europe from a comparative perspective
  • The emergence of regional warrior mythologies, especially in the contested borderlands (for instance Tyrol or Transylvania)
  • The changing image of the “national warrior” (for instance the Czech legionnaire, the Hungarian Hussar, the Austrian Gebirgsjäger, )
  • Women warriors, gender roles, and their mythologies
  • The cult of national wars in education, particularly in school textbooks
  • Public representations of nation-building wars (street names, memorials, etc.)
  • Veteran and other patriotic associations promoting martial virtues and/or the cult of certain conflicts
  • The changing cult of the fallen heroes killed in national wars
  • Transnational war heroes (for instance Miklós/Nikolaus Zrinyi) and their cults

Please send an abstract of no more than 500 words and a short biographical note with a selected list of the author’s three most important publications (we do not accept full CVs) no later than May 15, 2021.

 

Proposals should be submitted to the special editor of the issue by email:

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

The editors will ask the authors of selected papers to submit their final articles (max. 10,000 words) no later than September 15, 2021.

The articles will be published after a double-blind peer-review process. We provide proofreading for contributors who are not native speakers of English.

All articles must conform to our submission guidelines.

The Hungarian Historical Review is a peer-reviewed international quarterly of the social sciences and humanities, the geographical focus of which is Hungary and East-Central Europe. For additional information, including submission guidelines, please visit the journal’s website: www.hunghist.org